Get each APP scam claim ready for the handler who decides it
UK rules. Reads the victim's account so the claim reaches the right team, and flags an ongoing scam or a need for support. A handler decides every claim.
Try it on this example
What the customer typed or said when they made the payment (empty if none): Purpose chosen: Paying a friend or family member Who is this payment to? a friend Have you met them in person? yes Has anyone told you what to say or which option to choose? no
Customer's account of what happened
- Which kind of case does the customer's account describe?APP scam100%
- Which scam story, if any, does the customer's account most resemble?Purchase from a stranger100%
- Does the customer's account describe the payment differently from what they said when they made it?Described differently73%
- Does the account show someone else telling the customer what to do, say or choose for the payment?Yes96%
- What does the customer say they were warned before making the payment?General warning only100%
- Does the customer mention installing an app or software for someone, or someone seeing or using their screen?No92%
- Does the customer say they are still in contact with the scammer, or may send more money?No94%
- Does the account suggest the customer passed money on for someone else?No95%
- Does the customer mention circumstances that may mean they need extra support?Yes96%
- Does the customer say they reported the scam to the police?Yes99%
- Is there enough in the account to tell what kind of case this is and what happened?Yes97%
These are real answers stored from one run on this example.
The prism behind it
Get each APP scam claim ready for the handler who decides it
Fields
- Customer's account of what happened
- What the customer typed or said when they made the payment (empty if none)
Context
These are scam claims made to a UK bank after the customer sent money by bank transfer. The claim statement is the customer's account of what happened, from a web form, a chat or a call note. The payment time answers are what the customer typed or said when they made the payment, if the bank asked; the field is empty when it did not. The UK rules on authorised push payment (APP) scams, in general terms: individuals, micro-enterprises and charities tricked into sending money to a fraudster over Faster Payments or CHAPS can claim within 13 months of the payment, up to £85,000. The firm reimburses within 5 business days of the claim or, if it stops the clock to gather information, reaches an outcome within 35 business days. The firm may apply an excess of up to £100, but not to a vulnerable consumer. There is no reimbursement where the customer was complicit in the fraud or grossly negligent; gross negligence is a high bar, and that exception does not apply to a vulnerable consumer. The customer is asked to report to the police, or to let the firm report on their behalf. A payment the customer did not make is an unauthorised payment and goes to the fraud disputes team. A dispute with a real seller or trader who delivered late, poorly or not at all is a civil dispute, not a scam. The scam stories the fraud team reports on: bank or police impersonation, other impersonation, investment, romance, purchase from a stranger, invoice or bank detail change, advance fee, job or task scams, and a relative on a new number. The four drivers of vulnerability: poor health, life events, low resilience and low capability. Each claim is read on arrival so a handler starts with the right questions. Treat the customer as a victim. Judge only what the account says, never whether the customer is telling the truth. Never treat a name, an accent, a language, an age or a place as a sign. These answers never approve, reduce or refuse a claim, never apply the excess and never decide whether an exception applies: a claims handler decides every claim, and a specialist reviews any claim where the customer mentions circumstances that need extra support. Amounts, dates, the 13-month limit, the cap and the customer's claim history are worked out by code.
Questions
Which kind of case does the customer's account describe? Choice
Judge from what the customer says happened, not from the words they use: "scam" and "fraud" appear in every kind of case. Pick one option.
Which scam story, if any, does the customer's account most resemble? Choice
Pick the one scam story named in the context that the account most resembles. Choose No scam story when the account describes no scam, such as a payment the customer did not make or a dispute with a real seller.
Does the customer's account describe the payment differently from what they said when they made it? Choice
Compare the claim statement with the payment time answers. Victims are often told what to say when they pay, so a difference is a question for the handler, never a sign that the customer is lying.
Does the account show someone else telling the customer what to do, say or choose for the payment? Yes / No
Count "I was told to", "he said to pick", being told which purpose to choose or what to type, being told to keep the payment from the bank, family or friends, and being talked through the payment on the phone. A seller or landlord asking to be paid, with nothing more, does not count. Yes: Someone else directed the payment, what the customer chose or typed, or the secrecy around it. No: The customer describes making the payment on their own terms, with no sign that someone directed them.
What does the customer say they were warned before making the payment? Choice
Judge only what the customer's account says; the handler checks the bank's own record of the warnings it showed. A warning the customer mentions is a fact for the handler, never a finding of gross negligence. Pick one option.
Does the customer mention installing an app or software for someone, or someone seeing or using their screen? Yes / No
Count screen-sharing or remote access apps, an app installed at someone's request, someone logging in for the customer, or someone watching their screen or phone while they made the payment. Yes: The customer mentions something of this kind. No: Nothing of this kind is mentioned, or the customer says no one had access to their device.
Does the customer say they are still in contact with the scammer, or may send more money? Yes / No
Count messages still going back and forth, a promise of another step or payment, the customer waiting to hear back, and a new contact offering to recover the money for a fee. A customer who has blocked the scammer, or says contact has ended, does not count. Yes: The account shows that contact with the scammer, or with someone offering recovery, is still going on, or that more money may go. No: The account says contact has ended, or says nothing to suggest it continues.
Does the account suggest the customer passed money on for someone else? Yes / No
Count receiving money into their account and sending it on, a "payment processing" or "money transfer" role, being paid to let their account be used, and paying on behalf of someone they met through the scam. This often happens in job scams and does not by itself mean the customer knew; a handler looks. Yes: The account says or suggests the customer moved money on for someone else. No: The customer paid for a purpose of their own and says nothing about moving money for anyone.
Does the customer mention circumstances that may mean they need extra support? Yes / No
Use the four drivers in the context: health, life events, resilience and capability. Count only what the account says about the customer or someone in their household. Do not infer anything from tone, writing style or spelling. Yes: The account mentions health problems, disability, bereavement, old age, money trouble beyond the loss itself, a language or literacy barrier, or similar circumstances. No: The account mentions none of these.
Does the customer say they reported the scam to the police? Yes / No
Count a report to the police or to the national fraud reporting service, with or without a reference, and the customer agreeing that the bank may report it for them. Yes: The customer says they reported it, or agreed that the bank may report it. No: The customer does not say so, or says they have not reported it yet.
Is there enough in the account to tell what kind of case this is and what happened? Yes / No
Yes: The account says who the customer paid, how the contact began and why they paid, well enough to tell the kind of case. No: The account is too short or vague to tell, for example "I've been scammed, please refund me", and the handler must ask the customer first.
Lens columns
claim_kind, claim_kind_probability, scam_story, scam_story_probability, payment_answers_mismatch, payment_answers_mismatch_probability, someone_directing, someone_directing_probability, warning_before_payment, warning_before_payment_probability, remote_access, remote_access_probability, still_in_contact, still_in_contact_probability, mule_signals, mule_signals_probability, vulnerability_signal, vulnerability_signal_probability, police_reported, police_reported_probability, enough_information, enough_information_probability
Run it on your own text
Add this prism in the app, change any question, and test it on a file of your own.