Sort Medicare plan appeals, grievances and coverage requests
US Medicare Advantage and Part D plans. Gives each request its process and a fast-decision flag for a coordinator to confirm. It never decides coverage.
Try it on this example
Channel (fax, letter, portal, email, call note): Fax
Item text
- Under the plan's definitions, which process does the item's main request belong to?Appeal of a coverage decision100%
- Does the item also hold a second request of a different type that needs its own case?Yes98%
- Is the main request about a prescription drug rather than a medical service, item or stay?No95%
- Does the item say the plan has already refused, reduced or stopped coverage or payment?Yes92%
- Does the item ask for a fast decision, or say waiting could harm the member's health?Yes97%
- Does a physician or prescriber state that the standard timeframe could seriously jeopardize the member's life, health or ability to regain function?No90%
- Does the item complain that the plan refused to fast-track a request or took an extension on a decision?No89%
- Does the item say the medical care the member received was poor or unsafe?No86%
- Is the item written or spoken by someone other than the member?Yes99%
- Does the member or representative express dissatisfaction with the plan, its staff or a provider?Yes99%
- Does the item say who the member is, what service, drug or decision it is about and what they want, well enough to open a case?Yes96%
These are real answers stored from one run on this example.
The prism behind it
Sort Medicare plan appeals, grievances and coverage requests
Fields
- Channel (fax, letter, portal, email, call note)
- Item text
Context
Intake rules of a US Medicare Advantage plan with Part D drug coverage, summarised from the CMS rules on grievances, organization and coverage determinations, and appeals. Items arrive by fax, letter, portal message, email and call note, from members, their representatives and providers. Each item is read here on arrival so an intake coordinator can open the right case type. Nothing here decides coverage, medical necessity, or whether a request meets the criteria for an expedited decision: a clinician decides that. Code records the receipt time and runs every clock. Coverage request (organization or coverage determination): the member, a representative or a provider asks the plan to approve, provide or pay for a medical service, item, stay or drug that the plan has not yet decided on. This includes asking the plan to pay the member back for care already received. A complaint about what a drug costs, or about a pharmacy that will not fill a prescription, is treated as a coverage request, because the plan may need to make a coverage decision. Appeal (reconsideration or redetermination): asks the plan to review a decision it has already made to refuse, reduce or stop a service, item, stay or drug, or to refuse payment. A request to review a notice that covered care at a skilled nursing facility, home health agency or rehabilitation facility will end counts as an appeal; staff decide whether it goes to the fast-track review route. Grievance: dissatisfaction with the plan, its staff, a provider, access to care or the plan's process, where no coverage decision is asked for or challenged. A grievance about the quality of medical care is answered in writing with the member's right to complain to the Quality Improvement Organization. A grievance about the plan refusing to fast-track a request, or taking an extension on a decision, is answered within 24 hours. Expedited decision: the member, a representative or a physician may ask for a fast decision. The plan must expedite when a physician says the standard timeframe could seriously jeopardize the member's life, health or ability to regain maximum function. A request only to pay for care already received is not expedited. When an item holds both a grievance and a coverage request or appeal, the coverage request or appeal is the main request and the grievance is a second case. Go only on what the item says. Whether the member's identity, a representative form or a prior decision is on file is checked by code.
Questions
Under the plan's definitions, which process does the item's main request belong to? Choice
Read the item and the definitions in the context. Choose the process for the main request. When the item holds both a grievance and a coverage request or appeal, choose the coverage request or appeal; the grievance is picked up by the second request question. This only suggests a case type for a coordinator to confirm.
Does the item also hold a second request of a different type that needs its own case? Yes / No
Read the item. Besides its main request, does it also hold a separate request that belongs to a different process in the context, such as a grievance about a phone call inside an appeal, or a coverage request inside a complaint about staff? Yes: The item holds at least two requests that belong to different processes. No: The item holds one request, or several points about the same request.
Is the main request about a prescription drug rather than a medical service, item or stay? Yes / No
Read the item. Is the main request about a prescription drug the member takes or has been prescribed, including its cost, a refill or a pharmacy? Yes: The main request is about a prescription drug. No: The main request is about a medical service, item, stay, the plan itself, or nothing to do with drugs.
Does the item say the plan has already refused, reduced or stopped coverage or payment? Yes / No
Read the item. Does it say the plan has already refused, reduced or stopped coverage or payment, or refer to a notice, letter or call that told the member so? Yes: The item says a decision or notice of that kind already exists. No: The item describes no earlier decision by the plan. A price change or a pharmacy refusing to fill, with no plan decision described, is No.
Does the item ask for a fast decision, or say waiting could harm the member's health? Yes / No
Read the item. Does the member, a representative or a provider ask for a fast, urgent or immediate decision, or say that waiting could harm the member's health, for example a discharge in the next few days or a member about to run out of a medicine? This flags the item for a clinician, who decides whether it qualifies as expedited. Yes: The item asks for speed or says waiting could cause harm. No: The item asks for nothing urgent and describes no harm from waiting.
Does a physician or prescriber state that the standard timeframe could seriously jeopardize the member's life, health or ability to regain function? Yes / No
Read the item. Does a physician or prescriber, in their own letter, note or call, say that waiting the standard time could seriously jeopardize the member's life, health or ability to regain maximum function? The view of a therapist, nurse, relative or the member does not count, and neither does a relative's report of what a doctor said. Yes: A physician or prescriber makes that statement in the item. No: No physician or prescriber makes that statement.
Does the item complain that the plan refused to fast-track a request or took an extension on a decision? Yes / No
Read the item and the definition of grievance in the context. Does the member or a representative complain that the plan refused a request for a fast decision, or that the plan took an extension on a decision? This kind of grievance is answered within 24 hours. Yes: The item complains about a refused fast-track request or an extension. No: The item makes no complaint of that kind.
Does the item say the medical care the member received was poor or unsafe? Yes / No
Read the item. Does it say the care from a doctor, hospital, facility or other provider was poor, wrong or unsafe, such as a missed diagnosis, a wrong medicine or neglect? Complaints about the plan's own service, such as phone calls or letters, do not count. Yes: The item describes care the member received as poor or unsafe. No: The item describes no concern about the quality of medical care.
Is the item written or spoken by someone other than the member? Yes / No
Read the item. Is the writer or caller someone other than the member, such as a relative, a caregiver, a lawyer or a provider? Code checks whether a representative form is on file. Yes: Someone other than the member wrote the item or is speaking for the member. No: The member wrote the item or is speaking for themselves.
Does the member or representative express dissatisfaction with the plan, its staff or a provider? Yes / No
Read the item. Does the writer or caller express dissatisfaction with anything the plan, its staff or a provider did or failed to do, in any words? They do not need to use the word complaint. Yes: The item expresses dissatisfaction. No: The item makes its request without any dissatisfaction.
Does the item say who the member is, what service, drug or decision it is about and what they want, well enough to open a case? Yes / No
Read the item. Does it identify the member (a name, or a member ID or card said to be attached), the service, drug, stay or decision concerned, and what the member wants, clearly enough for a coordinator to open a case without contacting anyone first? Code checks the member's identity against plan records. Yes: All three are there. No: At least one is missing, or the text is too unclear or garbled to tell.
Lens columns
request_type, request_type_probability, second_request, second_request_probability, about_prescription_drug, about_prescription_drug_probability, prior_decision_referenced, prior_decision_referenced_probability, fast_decision_requested, fast_decision_requested_probability, physician_states_jeopardy, physician_states_jeopardy_probability, complaint_about_fast_track_or_extension, complaint_about_fast_track_or_extension_probability, quality_of_care_concern, quality_of_care_concern_probability, filed_by_someone_else, filed_by_someone_else_probability, dissatisfaction_expressed, dissatisfaction_expressed_probability, enough_to_open, enough_to_open_probability
Run it on your own text
Add this prism in the app, change any question, and test it on a file of your own.