Sort bag claims by what went wrong and the proof attached
Reads each bag claim for the problem, a match with the airport report and the receipts and photos sent. Limits and payments stay with people.
Try it on this example
Report filed at the airport (delayed, damaged, pilfered, or none): Delayed bag
Attachment file names (empty if none): receipts_clothes_toiletries.pdf, zip_photo_1.jpg, zip_photo_2.jpg
Claim form text or email
- What baggage problem is the passenger claiming for?Missing contents64%
- Does the baggage claim cover more than one kind of problem?Yes98%
- Does the baggage claim describe the same problem as the report filed at the airport?Adds problems96%
- Does the baggage claim include items from the list a handler must review, such as cash, jewellery or electronics?Yes98%
- Does the claim say receipts or other proof of what was paid are attached, offered or kept?Yes98%
- Does the passenger attach or offer photos of the damage?Photos attached or offered100%
- Does the passenger say they are thinking of getting a lawyer or taking the airline to court?No95%
- Does the baggage claim say which flight or airport report it concerns and what went wrong, well enough to act?Yes98%
These are real answers stored from one run on this example.
The prism behind it
Sort bag claims by what went wrong and the proof attached
Fields
- Report filed at the airport (delayed, damaged, pilfered, or none)
- Claim form text or email
- Attachment file names (empty if none)
Context
We are Northvale Airways. After a baggage problem, passengers usually file a report at the airport and then claim through our web form or by email. Each claim is read here when it is submitted. Code matches the claim to the airport report and the booking, and applies the time limits and liability limits. A baggage claims handler decides every payment; nothing here decides whether anything is owed. Our terms: - Bag not delivered: the bag has still not reached the passenger. Code decides from the dates whether it now counts as lost. - Missing contents: items taken from a bag that did arrive. - Damaged contents: items inside the bag broken or spoiled. - Damaged bag: the case itself is broken, torn, cracked or soiled. - Delay expenses: what the passenger paid for essentials while the bag was delayed. Items a handler reviews before any offer: cash, jewellery, watches, electronics (laptops, cameras, phones, headphones, chargers), medicines, keys, documents, fragile items and perishable goods. Time limits, applied by code: under the Montreal Convention a passenger must complain in writing within 7 days of receiving a damaged bag and within 21 days of receiving a delayed bag. A bag that has not arrived 21 days after it should have may be claimed for as lost.
Questions
What baggage problem is the passenger claiming for? Choice
Use the terms in the context. When the claim covers more than one problem, pick the first that applies in this order: bag not delivered, missing contents, damaged contents, damaged bag, delay expenses. The several problems question records the rest.
Does the baggage claim cover more than one kind of problem? Yes / No
Count the five kinds of problem in the context. Several items missing from one bag is one kind of problem. Yes: The claim covers two or more kinds, such as delay expenses and a damaged bag. No: The claim covers one kind of problem only.
Does the baggage claim describe the same problem as the report filed at the airport? Choice
Compare the problems the claim describes with the report type field. A report of a delayed bag matches a claim for a bag not delivered or for delay expenses.
Does the baggage claim include items from the list a handler must review, such as cash, jewellery or electronics? Yes / No
Use the list of items in the context. Count items claimed as missing, damaged or lost, whatever the passenger calls them: "camera lens" and "earbuds" are electronics. Essentials bought while waiting for a delayed bag do not count. Yes: The claim includes at least one item from the list. No: The claim includes no item from the list.
Does the claim say receipts or other proof of what was paid are attached, offered or kept? Yes / No
Read the claim and any attachment names. Count receipts, invoices, bank statements and order confirmations that are attached, offered, to be sent or kept. Yes: The claim attaches or offers proof of what was paid for at least one item or cost, or says it has been kept. No: No such proof is attached, offered or said to be kept, the claim says there is none, or it claims no costs.
Does the passenger attach or offer photos of the damage? Choice
Read the claim and the attachment names.
Does the passenger say they are thinking of getting a lawyer or taking the airline to court? Yes / No
This is a sign the case needs a handler sooner, never a reason to discourage the passenger. A complaint to a regulator or a dispute resolution body is an escalation, not legal action. Yes: The passenger says they may get a lawyer, have spoken to one, or may take us to court. No: No such intention is stated, or the only escalation mentioned is a regulator or dispute resolution body.
Does the baggage claim say which flight or airport report it concerns and what went wrong, well enough to act? Yes / No
A flight number, a booking reference or an airport report reference is enough to find the case; code does the matching. Yes: The claim names a flight, booking or report reference and says what went wrong. No: The claim gives no way to find the case, or does not say what went wrong.
Lens columns
claim_type, claim_type_probability, several_problems, several_problems_probability, matches_report, matches_report_probability, listed_items_claimed, listed_items_claimed_probability, receipts_mentioned, receipts_mentioned_probability, damage_photos, damage_photos_probability, considering_legal_action, considering_legal_action_probability, enough_to_act, enough_to_act_probability
Run it on your own text
Add this prism in the app, change any question, and test it on a file of your own.