Sort a law firm's matter inbox so nothing urgent waits
Labels each matter email and flags settlement offers, deadlines, client instructions and unhappy clients. It reads no dates and gives no advice.
Try it on this example
Sender role on the matter (Client, Other side, Court, Expert or Other): Client
Email subject: RE: Dorrance v. Vantner - interrogatory responses
Email body, quoted history trimmed
- What is the main business of this email on the matter?Complaint about the firm100%
- Does the email make, answer or report an offer or proposal to settle all or part of the matter?No92%
- Does the email set, move or state a deadline, hearing date or time limit?Yes98%
- Does the client instruct the firm to take, change or stop a step in the matter?Yes84%
- Does the writer express dissatisfaction with the firm's work, fees, delay or conduct?Yes99%
- Does the writer mention circumstances that may mean the client needs extra support?No89%
- Does the email expect a reply or an action from the firm?Yes99%
- How soon should someone at the firm act on this email?Within a day86%
These are real answers stored from one run on this example.
The prism behind it
Sort a law firm's matter inbox so nothing urgent waits
Fields
- Sender role on the matter (Client, Other side, Court, Expert or Other)
- Email subject
- Email body, quoted history trimmed
Context
Emails filed to a matter at Ashcombe & Rudd LLP, a US law firm with a large litigation practice, or arriving in the inbox of a lawyer on the matter. Each email is labelled on arrival, so that whoever covers the matter sees what needs action, even when the responsible lawyer is away. The sender role is set by code from the matter's contact list. Firm rules: - Every settlement offer or proposal is passed to the client the same day it arrives. The responsible lawyer tells the client and advises on it; nothing here judges an offer. - Every date, hearing and time limit is entered by the docketing team. Nothing here reads or works out dates. - Any dissatisfaction a client expresses with the firm's work, fees, delay or conduct goes to the office of the firm's general counsel the same day, in whatever words it is expressed and whether or not the client calls it a complaint. - A client instruction that changes the matter (to file, sign, send, accept, reject, settle, withdraw or stop work) is confirmed in writing by the responsible lawyer. - Circumstances a client mentions that may call for extra support, such as illness or bereavement, are noted on the matter for the responsible lawyer.
Questions
What is the main business of this email on the matter? Choice
Read the sender role, the subject and the body. Choose what the email is mainly about: the part the writer spends most words on or asks the firm to act on first. Other things in the same email are recorded by the flags.
Does the email make, answer or report an offer or proposal to settle all or part of the matter? Yes / No
Count an offer with terms in any form: a proposal marked "without prejudice" or as a settlement communication, an offer of judgment, a counter-offer, an acceptance or rejection of an offer, or a report of an offer made elsewhere, such as at a mediation. A general wish to settle, or an invitation to talk about settlement with no terms, does not count. Yes: The email makes, answers or reports at least one offer or proposal to settle. No: No offer or proposal to settle appears.
Does the email set, move or state a deadline, hearing date or time limit? Yes / No
Count a date or time limit for a filing, a response, a discovery answer, a hearing or accepting an offer, whether the writer sets it or refers to one already set. Do not work out or compare any date; the docketing team does. Yes: The email sets, moves or states at least one deadline, hearing date or time limit. No: No deadline, hearing date or time limit appears.
Does the client instruct the firm to take, change or stop a step in the matter? Yes / No
Count an instruction only from the client, as the sender role and the email show. Count instructions to file, sign, send, accept, reject, settle, withdraw, agree or refuse something with the other side, or stop work. A question about whether to do something is not an instruction, and neither is a request for a draft or an update. Yes: The client gives at least one such instruction. No: No such instruction appears, or the email is not from the client.
Does the writer express dissatisfaction with the firm's work, fees, delay or conduct? Yes / No
Use the firm rules in the context. Dissatisfaction counts whatever the main purpose of the email, and whether or not the writer uses the word "complaint". Frustration only with the other side, the court or the way the case is going is not dissatisfaction with the firm. Yes: The writer is unhappy with something the firm did, failed to do, or charged. No: The email expresses no dissatisfaction with the firm.
Does the writer mention circumstances that may mean the client needs extra support? Yes / No
Use the firm rules in the context. Count only what the email says about the client or someone in their household. Do not infer anything from tone, writing style or spelling. Frustration or anger with the firm is not a circumstance of this kind. Yes: The email mentions health problems, disability, bereavement, old age, money trouble, a language or literacy barrier, or similar circumstances. No: The email mentions none of these.
Does the email expect a reply or an action from the firm? Yes / No
Yes: The writer asks a question, asks for something to be sent or done, or asks the firm to confirm or call. No: The email is for information only and asks nothing of the firm.
How soon should someone at the firm act on this email? Scale
Rate the most urgent thing in the email from what it says. Use words such as "today", "by Thursday" or "within 14 days"; do not compare dates with today.
Lens columns
message_type, message_type_probability, settlement_offer, settlement_offer_probability, deadline_stated, deadline_stated_probability, instruction_to_act, instruction_to_act_probability, complaint_expressed, complaint_expressed_probability, vulnerability_signal, vulnerability_signal_probability, reply_expected, reply_expected_probability, urgency, urgency_average
Run it on your own text
Add this prism in the app, change any question, and test it on a file of your own.