Check freight claims have what a written claim needs (US)
US rules. Checks each cargo claim for the three elements under 49 CFR 370, the loss type, delivery notes and proof. Claims staff decide liability.
Try it on this example
Attachment file names or descriptions (empty if none): delivery_receipt_7730418826.pdf, fairmount_photos_1-6.zip
Claim letter, email or form text
- Does the freight claim give facts enough to identify the shipment?Yes99%
- Does the freight claim hold the carrier responsible for the loss, damage or delay?Yes98%
- Does the freight claim demand a specific amount, or one that can be worked out from what it gives?Yes99%
- Is this document only a notice that a freight claim may follow?No97%
- What kind of loss does the freight claim describe?Concealed damage100%
- Does the freight claim say the problem was noted on the delivery receipt when the freight was delivered?No89%
- Does the freight claim enclose proof of the value of the goods, such as a commercial invoice?No83%
- Does the freight claim enclose evidence of the loss or damage, such as photos, an inspection report or the delivery receipt?Yes99%
- Is the freight claim filed by an insurer, broker or claims agent on the owner's behalf?No94%
- What does the freight claim say about the damaged goods now?Kept for inspection100%
- Is the item complete and readable enough to judge what it is?Yes98%
These are real answers stored from one run on this example.
The prism behind it
Check freight claims have what a written claim needs (US)
Fields
- Claim letter, email or form text
- Attachment file names or descriptions (empty if none)
Context
We are Pinecrest Freight Lines, a US less-than-truckload (LTL) carrier. Cargo claims arrive by email, through our web form and as scanned letters, from shippers, receivers, and insurers or claims agents acting for them. Each document is read here on receipt. Code logs complete claims and starts the acknowledgement and disposition clocks; for the rest, a claims person approves a letter saying what is missing. Whether a document is a valid claim, and whether we are liable, is decided by the claims team, never here. US rules the questions rely on (49 CFR Part 370), in short: - A written communication is a claim only when it contains facts enough to identify the shipment, asserts liability for loss, damage or delay, and demands payment of a specified or determinable amount. - The carrier must acknowledge a claim within 30 days of receiving it, and pay, decline or make a firm offer within 120 days. Code counts these days. Our terms: - Identifying a shipment: a PRO number (our freight bill number), a bill of lading number, or the shipping or delivery date with the shipper and receiver. - Visible damage: damage seen and noted when the freight was delivered. - Concealed damage: damage found after delivery, when the packaging was opened. - Shortage: part of the shipment not delivered. - Total loss: the whole shipment lost or stolen. - Delay: goods delivered late, with a loss of value or extra costs. - Temperature: goods spoiled by heat or cold. - Wet or contaminated: goods wet, soiled or contaminated in transit. - Overcharge: a dispute about the freight bill, handled by billing, not a cargo claim.
Questions
Does the freight claim give facts enough to identify the shipment? Yes / No
Count a PRO number or bill of lading number, or a shipping or delivery date together with the shipper and receiver. Do not check that any number is valid; code matches it. Yes: The claim gives at least one of these ways to identify the shipment. No: The claim gives no reference and not enough dates and parties to find the shipment.
Does the freight claim hold the carrier responsible for the loss, damage or delay? Yes / No
Count "we hold you liable", "we hold you responsible", "we claim against you" and any paraphrase. Describing the damage without saying the carrier is responsible does not count, nor does reserving the right to claim later. Yes: The claim says the carrier is responsible. No: The claim describes a problem without holding the carrier responsible.
Does the freight claim demand a specific amount, or one that can be worked out from what it gives? Yes / No
Count a stated total, or a unit price and a number of units that give one. "Full value", "to be advised" or "an amount to follow" does not count. Do not check the arithmetic. Yes: The claim demands a stated or determinable amount. No: The claim names no amount and gives nothing to work one out from.
Is this document only a notice that a freight claim may follow? Yes / No
A notice of intent reports a problem and says a claim will or may follow, or reserves the right to claim, without demanding an amount now. Yes: The document is a notice that a claim may follow. No: The document makes a claim now, or is about something else.
What kind of loss does the freight claim describe? Choice
Use the terms in the context. When the claim describes more than one, pick the one that accounts for most of the goods affected.
Does the freight claim say the problem was noted on the delivery receipt when the freight was delivered? Yes / No
Count a notation, exception or remark on the delivery receipt or proof of delivery. A receipt signed "subject to inspection" with no named problem does not count. Yes: The claim says the problem was noted on the delivery receipt. No: The claim says the receipt was signed clear, or does not say the problem was noted.
Does the freight claim enclose proof of the value of the goods, such as a commercial invoice? Yes / No
Read the claim and the attachments. Count an invoice, a price list, or a repair estimate enclosed now. A promise to send one later does not count. Yes: Proof of value is attached or enclosed. No: No proof of value is enclosed yet.
Does the freight claim enclose evidence of the loss or damage, such as photos, an inspection report or the delivery receipt? Yes / No
Read the claim and the attachments. Count photos, an inspection or survey report, and a copy of the delivery receipt or proof of delivery, enclosed now. Yes: At least one such item is attached or enclosed. No: None is enclosed yet.
Is the freight claim filed by an insurer, broker or claims agent on the owner's behalf? Yes / No
Judge from who writes and for whom. A shipper's or receiver's own staff are not a third party. Yes: An insurer, broker, claims agent or lawyer files the claim for the owner of the goods. No: The shipper or receiver files the claim themselves.
What does the freight claim say about the damaged goods now? Choice
Answer only from what the claim says about the goods after the loss.
Is the item complete and readable enough to judge what it is? Yes / No
Scanned letters come through OCR and can be garbled, cut off or blank. Poor spelling or grammar does not make an item unreadable if its meaning is clear. Yes: Enough of the text is readable to tell what the item is and what the sender wants. No: The text is too garbled, truncated or empty to judge.
Lens columns
identifies_shipment, identifies_shipment_probability, asserts_liability, asserts_liability_probability, amount_demanded, amount_demanded_probability, intent_only, intent_only_probability, claim_type, claim_type_probability, exception_noted_at_delivery, exception_noted_at_delivery_probability, value_proof_enclosed, value_proof_enclosed_probability, condition_evidence_enclosed, condition_evidence_enclosed_probability, filed_by_third_party, filed_by_third_party_probability, goods_held, goods_held_probability, text_readable, text_readable_probability
Run it on your own text
Add this prism in the app, change any question, and test it on a file of your own.