Send every IT ticket to the right resolver group
Picks the resolver group from your list, tells incidents from requests, marks impact and flags security signs in login tickets. The groups are an example.
Try it on this example
Ticket short description: Can't get into SAP or email since this morning
Channel (portal, email, chat, phone note): portal
Ticket description, with any replies from the user
- Which resolver group should own the fix or fulfilment for this ticket?Identity and access99%
- Is this ticket an incident, a service request or a question?Incident100%
- Does the ticket say that more than one person has the problem?No94%
- Does the user say they cannot do their work at all because of this problem?Yes95%
- Does the ticket concern one of the business-critical services named in the context?Yes99%
- Does the ticket describe a possible security event, even in passing?Yes98%
- Does the ticket ask for a password reset, an MFA reset, an account unlock or a new sign-in device?Yes99%
- Does the ticket ask for new or wider access to a system, folder, mailbox or data?No92%
- Does the user say what they have already tried to fix the problem?Yes98%
- Does the ticket give enough detail for the resolver group to start without going back to the user?Yes95%
These are real answers stored from one run on this example.
The prism behind it
Send every IT ticket to the right resolver group
Fields
- Ticket short description
- Ticket description, with any replies from the user
- Channel (portal, email, chat, phone note)
Context
We are Fenwick Industrial, a manufacturer with about 4,000 staff at three plants and a head office. Staff raise IT tickets through the self-service portal, by email to the service desk, in the IT help channel in Teams, or by phone, when the service desk analyst writes a note. Each ticket is read here when it is created, and again when the user replies to a closed ticket. The answers set the assignment group and the flags; a service desk analyst checks anything the answers are unsure about. Routing rules: - One ticket, one group: the group that fixes the fault or fulfils the request. When a ticket raises more than one problem, pick the group for the one that stops the user working. - A security sign inside a ticket about something else does not change the group. The security question marks it, and code copies the ticket to security operations. Security operations is the group only when reporting a security event is the point of the ticket. - Restoring access a user already had (a locked account, an expired password, a new phone for MFA) belongs to Identity and access. New or wider access is an access request and goes through approval. - IT never asks anyone for a password or a one-time code, by any channel. Business-critical services: SAP (finance, purchasing and supply chain), the production execution system on the plant floors, email, and the shared drives. Code, not these answers, handles SLA timers, VIP users, the check for other tickets on the same service, and the identity check before any reset.
Questions
Which resolver group should own the fix or fulfilment for this ticket? Choice
Pick the one group that fixes the fault or fulfils the request, using the routing rules in the context. When the ticket raises more than one problem, pick the group for the one that stops the user working. A security sign mentioned in passing does not make Security operations the group.
Is this ticket an incident, a service request or a question? Choice
Judge what the user needs, not the form they used. A ticket that reports a fault and also asks for a reset is an incident.
Does the ticket say that more than one person has the problem? Yes / No
Count a team, a site, a department, "everyone" or "all of us", or colleagues named as having the same problem. Yes: The ticket says or clearly implies that more than one person has the problem. No: Only the writer is affected, or the ticket says nothing about anyone else.
Does the user say they cannot do their work at all because of this problem? Yes / No
Judge from what the user says about their work, not from how serious the fault sounds. Yes: The user says, or the ticket makes plain, that they cannot do their job or a key task right now. No: The problem is slow, awkward or has a workaround, or the ticket asks for something new with no work stopped.
Does the ticket concern one of the business-critical services named in the context? Yes / No
Use only the list of business-critical services in the context. Yes: The ticket is about one of those services, or about a problem that stops the user reaching one of them. No: The ticket concerns no service on that list.
Does the ticket describe a possible security event, even in passing? Yes / No
Read the whole ticket, including remarks made in passing. Count: clicking a suspicious link or opening an unexpected attachment; entering a password on an unfamiliar page; sign-in or MFA prompts the user did not start, whether they were approved or denied; alerts about sign-ins the user did not make; a lost or stolen device; pop-ups demanding payment or files that suddenly changed or disappeared; someone asking the user for their password or a code. A user who simply forgot a password is not a security event. Yes: At least one such sign appears, however briefly. No: No such sign appears.
Does the ticket ask for a password reset, an MFA reset, an account unlock or a new sign-in device? Yes / No
Count a request for the writer or for someone else, in any words. Do not judge whether the person is who they say they are; the context says code runs the identity check before any reset. Yes: The ticket asks for a password or MFA reset, an account unlock, or a new phone or device to be set up for sign-in. No: No such request appears.
Does the ticket ask for new or wider access to a system, folder, mailbox or data? Yes / No
Restoring access the user already had, such as unlocking an account, is not a new access request. Yes: The ticket asks for access the person does not have today, for themselves or for someone else. No: No new or wider access is asked for, including when the ticket only asks for a reset, an unlock or access the user already had.
Does the user say what they have already tried to fix the problem? Yes / No
Count restarting, signing out and back in, using the password reset page, trying another device or network, or any other step the user says they took. Yes: The user says they tried at least one step. No: The user mentions no step they took.
Does the ticket give enough detail for the resolver group to start without going back to the user? Yes / No
Enough means what is wrong or wanted, which system or device, and, for a fault, what the user sees, such as an error message. Yes: A resolver could start work from the ticket as written. No: The resolver would have to ask the user what is wrong, where, or which system.
Lens columns
assignment_group, assignment_group_probability, ticket_kind, ticket_kind_probability, many_users_affected, many_users_affected_probability, work_stopped, work_stopped_probability, business_critical_service, business_critical_service_probability, security_concern, security_concern_probability, credential_reset_requested, credential_reset_requested_probability, access_request, access_request_probability, already_tried_fix, already_tried_fix_probability, enough_detail, enough_detail_probability
Run it on your own text
Add this prism in the app, change any question, and test it on a file of your own.