Prioritise new law firm enquiries and flag conflict checks
Reads each law firm enquiry for the matter type, how soon to call back, other parties named and private detail shared. Conflict checks stay with you.
Try it on this example
Where it came from (website form, email, chat): Website form
Enquiry text
- Does the enquiry say enough about the problem to tell what kind of legal matter it is?Yes98%
- What kind of legal matter does the enquiry describe?Employment100%
- Does the enquiry name or clearly identify another party to the matter?Yes99%
- Has the enquirer already shared detailed private facts about their case, beyond a short description?Yes98%
- Does the enquiry mention a court date, hearing, deadline or time limit?Yes97%
- Does the enquirer say they are a current or former client of the firm?No84%
- How soon should the firm call the enquirer back?Today99%
- Given the firm's practice areas, what should intake do with this enquiry?Call back100%
These are real answers stored from one run on this example.
The prism behind it
Prioritise new law firm enquiries and flag conflict checks
Fields
- Enquiry text
- Where it came from (website form, email, chat)
Context
New enquiries to Coyle Bennett, a US consumer law firm. Practice areas: personal injury (road accidents, falls, dog bites, injuries at work caused by someone other than the employer); employment, for employees only (dismissal, discrimination, retaliation, harassment, unpaid wages and overtime, severance agreements); family law (divorce, custody, child support); wills, trusts and probate. Matters the firm does not take: criminal defence, immigration, bankruptcy, landlord and tenant disputes, disputes between businesses, and any work for employers. Enquiries arrive from the website form, email and chat at any hour, and each is sorted here as it arrives. Rules: - Before anyone replies with more than an acknowledgement, code pulls the names from the enquiry and the conflicts team searches the conflicts database. Nothing here names parties or runs the check. - The acknowledgement asks enquirers not to send more detail until the firm calls. When an enquirer has already shared detailed private facts, the conflicts team is told. - A lawyer works out any time limit. Nothing here reads or compares dates. - Emergencies, such as an arrest, a protective order or a child at risk, go to the duty lawyer straight away. - The firm gives no advice before it has agreed to act.
Questions
Does the enquiry say enough about the problem to tell what kind of legal matter it is? Yes / No
Yes: The enquiry describes the problem well enough to place it in a kind of legal matter, however briefly. No: The enquiry gives only a name, a phone number, "please call me" or similar, with nothing about the problem.
What kind of legal matter does the enquiry describe? Choice
Choose by the problem the enquirer describes, not by the words they use for it. Judge the kind of matter only; whether the firm takes it is asked separately.
Does the enquiry name or clearly identify another party to the matter? Yes / No
Count a person or organisation on the other side or otherwise involved: an employer, a manager, a spouse, a driver, a company, an insurer, a landlord. Count them when named, or described so that they could be found, such as "the bakery on Main Street where I work". The conflicts team decides what to search. Yes: At least one other party is named or clearly identified. No: No other party is named or identified.
Has the enquirer already shared detailed private facts about their case, beyond a short description? Yes / No
Count details such as the evidence they hold, what they said or did, admissions, messages from the other side, or what they plan to do. A short description of what happened does not count. Yes: The enquiry contains detailed private facts of this kind. No: The enquiry gives only a short description of the problem.
Does the enquiry mention a court date, hearing, deadline or time limit? Yes / No
Count a date for a court hearing, a deadline for signing or answering something, papers with a date to respond, or a time limit the enquirer says they were told about. The date of an accident or a dismissal on its own does not count; a lawyer works out time limits from it. Do not compare any date with today. Yes: The enquiry mentions at least one court date, hearing, deadline or time limit. No: No such date or time limit is mentioned.
Does the enquirer say they are a current or former client of the firm? Yes / No
Yes: The enquirer says the firm acts or has acted for them, or names a lawyer at the firm who helped them before. No: The enquirer says nothing of this kind, or says they have not used the firm before.
How soon should the firm call the enquirer back? Scale
Rate from what the enquiry says. Use words such as "this Friday", "tomorrow" or "next month"; do not compare dates with today.
Given the firm's practice areas, what should intake do with this enquiry? Choice
Use the practice areas and the matters the firm does not take, in the context. A person makes the call or sends the reply; this only suggests which.
Lens columns
enough_information, enough_information_probability, matter_type, matter_type_probability, other_party_named, other_party_named_probability, detailed_confidential_facts, detailed_confidential_facts_probability, deadline_stated, deadline_stated_probability, existing_client, existing_client_probability, urgency, urgency_average, suggested_step, suggested_step_probability
Run it on your own text
Add this prism in the app, change any question, and test it on a file of your own.