Turn "what is this payment for" into a purpose code
Maps the sender's own words to the destination's purpose list and says when they are vague or name two purposes. The sender confirms the purpose.
Try it on this example
Sender type (individual or business): individual
Destination country: India
Sender's own words: what is this payment for?
- Which purpose on the list best fits the sender's description of the payment?Payment for goods100%
- How clearly does the sender state what the payment is for?Stated100%
- Does the sender describe more than one purpose for the same payment?No91%
- Does the purpose described fit a business payment while the sender is an individual, or the other way round?Yes94%
- Which scam story, if any, do the sender's words most resemble?No scam story89%
These are real answers stored from one run on this example.
The prism behind it
Turn "what is this payment for" into a purpose code
Fields
- Sender's own words: what is this payment for?
- Sender type (individual or business)
- Destination country
Context
These are cross-border payments sent through Tidewell Remit, a money transfer service. Before a payment leaves, the sender says in their own words what it is for. Some destination countries require a purpose of payment from their official list on each payment, and payment messages carry a purpose code. The options in the purpose question are our generic list; for a corridor with its own list, we load that list in their place, each with its official description. Our code maps the chosen purpose to the corridor's official code and asks for any documents that purpose needs. The scam stories the compliance team works with: bank or police impersonation, other impersonation, investment, romance, purchase from a stranger, invoice or bank detail change, advance fee, job or task scams, and a relative on a new number. Judge only the sender's words. The sender stays responsible for the purpose they declare: these answers suggest a purpose for the sender to confirm, and ask the sender to choose when the words are unclear. A purpose never blocks a payment on its own; compliance reviews any payment code sends to it. Never treat the corridor, a name or a language as a sign.
Questions
Which purpose on the list best fits the sender's description of the payment? Choice
Pick the one purpose that fits the main thing the sender says the money is for. When the text names two purposes, pick the one it puts first or gives most weight; the multiple purposes question records the second.
How clearly does the sender state what the payment is for? Scale
Rate how clearly the words state one purpose, not whether the purpose is allowed.
Does the sender describe more than one purpose for the same payment? Yes / No
Count two purposes on the list in one payment, such as "hospital bills and her monthly groceries". Two items of the same purpose, such as two invoices for stock, do not count. Yes: The words describe two or more purposes on the list. No: The words describe one purpose, or none.
Does the purpose described fit a business payment while the sender is an individual, or the other way round? Yes / No
Compare the words with the sender type. A business payment is one for stock, supplies, staff, trade invoices or business services. A personal payment is one for family, gifts, study, health or the sender's own home. Yes: An individual describes a business payment, or a business describes a personal one. No: The purpose fits the sender type, or could fit either.
Which scam story, if any, do the sender's words most resemble? Choice
Pick the one scam story named in the context that the words most resemble. Choose No scam story when the words describe an ordinary payment.
Lens columns
purpose, purpose_probability, purpose_clarity, purpose_clarity_average, multiple_purposes, multiple_purposes_probability, sender_type_mismatch, sender_type_mismatch_probability, scam_story, scam_story_probability
Run it on your own text
Add this prism in the app, change any question, and test it on a file of your own.