Flag the regulator updates that touch your firm
Judges each regulator update against your firm's profile: does it apply, which business line and topic, what work it may cause. Compliance decides.
Try it on this example
Publisher and item type: UK financial regulator · policy statement
Title: Handling complaints about authorised push payment fraud: final rules and feedback on consultation
Text of the update, or its summary and first sections
- Does the item say enough about what changes, and for whom, to judge whether it applies to the firm?Yes94%
- Given the firm profile, does this update apply to the firm?Applies83%
- Which of the firm's business lines does the update mainly concern?Consumer accounts and cards100%
- What is the main subject of the update?Conduct and complaints99%
- What kind of publication is the update?Final rule or law100%
- Does the update create or change an obligation that would need a change to a process, policy, system, disclosure or report?Yes96%
- Does the update invite firms or the public to send comments, evidence or data?No90%
- Does the update describe a failing at another firm that our firm could check itself against?No92%
- How much work could this update cause the firm?Change programme99%
These are real answers stored from one run on this example.
The prism behind it
Flag the regulator updates that touch your firm
Fields
- Publisher and item type
- Title
- Text of the update, or its summary and first sections
Context
Firm profile of Fenmore Money, an electronic money institution authorised in the UK, with a separate e-money licence in Ireland for customers in the EU. What we do: - Consumer accounts and cards: e-money accounts for individuals, with a debit card and an app. About 400,000 customers in the UK and Ireland. - Business accounts: payment accounts for sole traders and companies with fewer than 50 staff. About 18,000 customers. - International transfers: money transfers from the UK and Ireland to 30 countries, through partner banks. What we do not do: lending of any kind, credit cards, savings or deposits, investments, insurance, crypto-assets, or payment services for large companies. We hold customer funds in safeguarding accounts at two banks. Card processing, cloud hosting and identity checks are outsourced. Each item from our feeds (UK and Irish financial regulators, the European supervisory authorities, card schemes, government and the courts) is read here as it is published. Items that do not apply are filed with their answers as the record of why. Others go to the team that owns the business line or topic. Nothing here interprets the law or says what we must do; the compliance team decides. Dates, such as when a rule comes into force or a consultation closes, are read by code from the feed.
Questions
Does the item say enough about what changes, and for whom, to judge whether it applies to the firm? Yes / No
Read the source, the title and the text. An item cut short, or a title with a line of summary, may not say which firms it covers or what they must do. Yes: The item says what it covers and which kinds of firm or activity it concerns. No: The item is too short or too general to tell which firms it concerns or what it changes.
Given the firm profile, does this update apply to the firm? Choice
Compare the kinds of firm, activity, product, customer and country the item covers with the firm profile in the context. Judge from the item and the profile only.
Which of the firm's business lines does the update mainly concern? Choice
Use the business lines in the firm profile. Choose the line whose products or customers the item is mainly about.
What is the main subject of the update? Choice
Choose the subject of what firms are asked to do, not of the events the item mentions.
What kind of publication is the update? Choice
Choose by what the publication is, not by what it is about.
Does the update create or change an obligation that would need a change to a process, policy, system, disclosure or report? Yes / No
Judge the obligation for the firms the item covers, whether or not it covers us; the applies question records that. Yes: The item creates, changes or removes something firms must do, or asks them to act, attest or report. No: The item describes, explains or proposes, and changes nothing firms must do yet.
Does the update invite firms or the public to send comments, evidence or data? Yes / No
Do not read the closing date; code takes it from the feed. Yes: The item asks for comments, responses, evidence or data from firms or the public. No: The item asks for no comments or data, or says a consultation has closed. Feedback on a past consultation, or a statement that no further comments are sought, is No.
Does the update describe a failing at another firm that our firm could check itself against? Yes / No
Yes: The item describes what a named firm, or firms in a review, did wrong in a way a firm like ours could also get wrong. No: The item describes no failing at another firm.
How much work could this update cause the firm? Scale
Judge the work for our firm, from the firm profile and the item. If nothing in the item touches our firm, choose None.
Lens columns
enough_information, enough_information_probability, applies, applies_probability, business_area, business_area_probability, topic, topic_probability, change_type, change_type_probability, new_obligation, new_obligation_probability, consultation_open, consultation_open_probability, enforcement_lesson, enforcement_lesson_probability, work_needed, work_needed_average
Run it on your own text
Add this prism in the app, change any question, and test it on a file of your own.