Spot a customer being coached by a scammer mid-conversation
UK rules. Reads a fraud chat or call every few turns for signs someone else is steering the customer. Signals for a trained person, not a payment decision.
Try it on this example
Channel (chat or call transcript): call transcript
The conversation so far, with speaker labels
- Is the customer asking the bank to make, release or allow a payment, a transfer or a higher limit in this conversation?Yes99%
- Does someone else appear to be telling the customer what to do or say in this conversation?Yes99%
- Do the customer's answers about the payment look scripted, changed or refused?Yes98%
- Has the customer been told to keep the payment secret or not to trust the bank?Yes98%
- Does the customer mention installing an app or software for someone, or someone seeing or using their screen?No86%
- Does the customer say the payment must happen now because of a deadline, a threat or a loss if they wait?Yes99%
- Which scam story, if any, does the conversation most resemble?Investment100%
- Does the customer express any doubt or worry about whether the payment or the person behind it is genuine?Yes97%
- What scam warning has the agent given so far in the conversation?General warning only100%
- How strongly does the conversation show the signs of a scam in progress?Strong100%
- What should the agent do next in this conversation?Bring in a fraud specialist now97%
These are real answers stored from one run on this example.
The prism behind it
Spot a customer being coached by a scammer mid-conversation
Fields
- Channel (chat or call transcript)
- The conversation so far, with speaker labels
Context
These are live chats and calls between a UK bank's fraud and payments agents and a customer, usually about a payment the bank has held, a new payee, or a request to raise a limit. The text is the conversation so far, read again every few turns while the customer is still there. Victims of impersonation, investment and romance scams often speak to the bank while the scammer coaches them on another line or has told them what to say beforehand. Under the UK rules on authorised push payment (APP) scams, the sending and the receiving firm share the cost of reimbursing most victims, so the moment the customer speaks to the bank is the best chance to break the spell. The scam stories the fraud team works with: bank or police impersonation, other impersonation, investment, romance, purchase from a stranger, invoice or bank detail change, advance fee, job or task scams, and a relative on a new number. The signs of coaching: someone else telling the customer what to do or say, a cover story, being told to keep it secret or not to trust the bank, someone on the customer's screen, and a deadline or threat. The customer is treated as a possible victim, never as a suspect. Judge only what is said. Never treat an accent, a language, a name, an age or a place as a sign, and do not count short, nervous or unclear answers on their own. Some victims show no signs at all, so these answers add to transaction monitoring and never replace it. Amounts, payee history and device data are checked elsewhere. The answers prompt the agent and alert a team leader. Whether a payment is released, held or returned is decided by a trained person, never by these answers.
Questions
Is the customer asking the bank to make, release or allow a payment, a transfer or a higher limit in this conversation? Yes / No
Count a request to release a held payment, to send a new payment, to add or confirm a payee, to raise a daily or single payment limit, or to unblock a card or account so a payment can go through. Yes: The customer is asking for money to move, or for a limit or block to change so it can. No: The conversation is about something else, such as a balance, a lost card or a question, and no payment or limit is asked for.
Does someone else appear to be telling the customer what to do or say in this conversation? Yes / No
Count "they said", "he told me to say", someone listening or talking on another line, the customer checking with someone before answering, or a named adviser, account manager or official who is guiding the payment. A relative helping at the customer's request, with no one else directing them, does not count. Yes: Someone other than the customer is directing the payment, the answers or the story. No: The customer speaks and decides for themselves, with no sign that anyone is steering them.
Do the customer's answers about the payment look scripted, changed or refused? Yes / No
Count a reason for the payment that changes during the conversation, a reason the customer says they were told to give, answers that sound read out, and refusing to say what the payment is for ("why do you need to know, it's my money"). Do not count short, hesitant or unclear answers, a language the customer is less at home in, or a customer who is simply annoyed by the check. Yes: At least one answer about the payment or the payee looks scripted, changes, or is refused. No: The customer explains the payment in their own words and the explanation holds together.
Has the customer been told to keep the payment secret or not to trust the bank? Yes / No
Count being told not to tell the bank, family or friends; being told the bank will try to stop the payment, is in on a fraud, or has staff involved in one; and being told to give the bank a false reason. Yes: The customer mentions at least one such instruction or belief. No: Nothing of this kind is said.
Does the customer mention installing an app or software for someone, or someone seeing or using their screen? Yes / No
Count screen-sharing or remote access apps, an app installed at someone's request, someone logging in for the customer, or someone watching their screen or phone while they make the payment. Yes: The customer mentions something of this kind. No: Nothing of this kind is mentioned, or the customer says no one has access to their device.
Does the customer say the payment must happen now because of a deadline, a threat or a loss if they wait? Yes / No
Count a stated deadline, a price window, a bonus or opportunity that will be lost, or a threat such as arrest, a fine or losing their money. An ordinary due date, such as rent due on the first of the month, does not count. Yes: The customer puts the payment under pressure of time or threat. No: No pressure of time or threat is stated.
Which scam story, if any, does the conversation most resemble? Choice
Pick the one scam story named in the context that the conversation most resembles. Choose No scam story when the customer describes an ordinary payment. Judge the story, not the payee name.
Does the customer express any doubt or worry about whether the payment or the person behind it is genuine? Yes / No
Count the customer wondering aloud, repeating a relative's or friend's warning, asking the agent whether the company or person is real, or saying something feels wrong. This is the moment the agent can use, so count it even when the customer goes on to insist on the payment. Yes: The customer voices at least one doubt, worry or question of this kind. No: The customer voices no doubt about the payment or the person behind it.
What scam warning has the agent given so far in the conversation? Choice
Judge only what the agent has said so far. A tailored warning names the scam the conversation resembles and the signs of it in this customer's own story. Pick one option.
How strongly does the conversation show the signs of a scam in progress? Scale
Rate how clearly the conversation, taken as a whole, shows one of the scam stories or the signs of coaching named in the context. Rate what is said, not the person and not the amount.
What should the agent do next in this conversation? Choice
Suggest the next step for the agent, a trained person who decides. None of these steps releases, holds or returns a payment; the fraud specialist decides that with the customer. Pick one option.
Lens columns
payment_at_stake, payment_at_stake_probability, someone_directing, someone_directing_probability, cover_story, cover_story_probability, secrecy_or_distrust, secrecy_or_distrust_probability, remote_access, remote_access_probability, urgency, urgency_probability, scam_story, scam_story_probability, customer_doubt, customer_doubt_probability, warning_given, warning_given_probability, signal_strength, signal_strength_average, suggested_step, suggested_step_probability
Run it on your own text
Add this prism in the app, change any question, and test it on a file of your own.