Sort a shared inbox by team, urgent ones first
Each email, form or ticket gets a team, what the sender wants and an urgency, with flags for a person first. The council teams are an example to replace.
Try it on this example
The prism behind it
Sort a shared inbox by team, urgent ones first
Fields
- Subject
- Email, form or ticket text
Context
We are Westmere Council, a UK unitary council. Residents, businesses, councillors and other organisations write to one contact address, through the website "contact us" form, or into the customer services case system. Each message is read here on arrival and sent to one service's queue. A person in the customer services triage team handles anything the answers are unsure about. Routing rules: - One message, one service. When a message raises more than one matter, route it by the matter that would do the most harm if it waited. A concern that someone may be at risk of harm always comes first. - A concern about an adult or a child is passed to a trained person in adult social care or children's services, who decides what to do. Nothing here decides that anyone is at risk. - Councillors and MPs who write for a resident are members, and their enquiries have their own deadline. - Requests for recorded information (Freedom of Information, Environmental Information Regulations) or for someone's own personal data go to information governance, whichever service they are about. - The case system matches references, addresses and account numbers. Nothing here looks them up.
Questions
Which council service should handle this email or ticket? Choice
Choose the one service that should handle the message, using the routing rules in the context. When the message raises more than one matter, choose the service for the matter that would do the most harm if it waited; a concern that someone may be at risk of harm always outranks the others.
What does the sender want from the council in this email or ticket? Choice
Judge the matter that would do the most harm if it waited, as in the routing rules in the context. Dissatisfaction elsewhere in the message is recorded by the complaint question.
How urgent is this email or ticket, from what the sender says? Scale
Rate the most urgent matter in the message, whatever service it belongs to. Do not compare dates with today; rely on words such as "tonight", "tomorrow" or "since last week".
Does the message raise a concern that a child or an adult may be at risk of harm or neglect? Yes / No
Count a concern about anyone: the sender, a relative, a neighbour or a stranger. This sends the message to a trained person the same hour; it is not a judgement that anyone is at risk. Yes: The message describes signs that someone may be harmed, neglected, unable to look after themselves, or not safe. No: The message raises no such concern.
Does the sender say they are homeless or may soon lose their home? Yes / No
Count a notice to leave, being told to go, sofa-surfing, sleeping rough, or losing a home through eviction or repossession. Yes: The sender says they, or the household they write for, are homeless or may lose their home. No: No such situation is described.
Does the sender express dissatisfaction with a council service, decision or member of staff? Yes / No
Count dissatisfaction anywhere in the message, whether or not the sender uses the word "complaint" and whatever else they ask for. Yes: The sender is unhappy with something the council did, failed to do or decided. No: The message expresses no dissatisfaction with the council.
Does the sender write as, or on behalf of, a councillor or MP? Yes / No
Yes: The message comes from a councillor, an MP or their office, or says it is sent on their behalf. No: The sender writes for themselves or another organisation.
Does the message raise a second matter that belongs to a different service? Yes / No
Count a matter only if a different service from the council service list would have to act on it. Yes: At least two matters in the message belong to different services. No: Everything in the message belongs to one service.
Is information missing that the service needs before it can act? Yes / No
Consider the main matter: where it is, what happened, who it concerns, or which account or case it is about. Do not check whether a reference or address is valid. Yes: The service could not act without asking the sender for more. No: The message gives enough for the service to start.
Does the sender ask for a phone call or to speak to a person? Yes / No
Yes: The sender asks to be phoned, to be called back, or to speak to someone. No: The sender asks for no call and no conversation.
Lens columns
service, service_probability, request_type, request_type_probability, urgency, urgency_average, person_at_risk, person_at_risk_probability, homeless_or_threatened, homeless_or_threatened_probability, complaint, complaint_probability, member_enquiry, member_enquiry_probability, second_matter, second_matter_probability, missing_details, missing_details_probability, callback_requested, callback_requested_probability
Run it on your own text
Add this prism in the app, change any question, and test it on a file of your own.