Fix time entries before the bill goes out
Prismlet checks each time entry against your client's billing guidelines as a lawyer saves it, and flags block billing, vague wording and work the client won't pay for. Billing coordinators can start the pre-bill review from the flagged lines instead of the whole bill.
Ask for an inviteToday
- Lawyers write time narratives in a hurry, often days late, and a billing coordinator reads every line of the pre-bill by hand before it reaches the client.
- Every entry needs the same read against the guidelines, and there are many of them, for example six a day for each lawyer.
- Keyword lists catch the word "review", but they cannot tell "draft and revise motion", one task, from "draft motion; call client; email team", three.
- Clients with outside counsel guidelines cut block-billed, vague and clerical entries after the bill is sent, and every cut counts against the firm's own realization.
What changes
- Every entry is checked against the client's guidelines as the lawyer saves it, so what needs fixing shows while the work is still fresh.
- Each entry gets a suggested UTBMS litigation task code and activity code for billing to accept or change.
- Each answer carries how sure it is, so entries the prism is unsure about can go to a person too, not just the clear misses.
- A billing coordinator's pre-bill pass can start from the flagged and unsure lines instead of the whole bill.
- Each flag is a suggestion for the lawyer or the billing coordinator to act on; the prism never rewrites a narrative or decides what goes on the bill.
Try it on this example
Matter type: Commercial litigation
Time entry narrative
- Is the narrative a description of work actually done?Yes92%
- Does the entry group two or more distinct tasks under one time charge?Yes95%
- Is any task in the narrative too vague for the client to tell what was done and why?No68%
- Does the entry include clerical or administrative work the client does not pay for?Yes98%
- Does the entry include a meeting, call or email among the firm's own people?Yes97%
- Does the entry include work the guidelines exclude other than clerical work and internal meetings?No88%
- Does the narrative contain anything unfit for the client's lawyers to read?No92%
- Which UTBMS litigation task code fits the main work in the entry?L330 Depositions100%
- Which UTBMS activity code fits the main work in the entry?A103 Draft or revise91%
- What should billing ask for before this entry goes on the bill?Send to billing review for excluded work85%
These are real answers stored from one run on this example.
Timekeeper role, as billed: Partner
Matter type: Commercial litigation
Invoice line narrative
- Is the narrative a description of work actually done?Yes93%
- Does the line group two or more distinct tasks under one time charge?Yes92%
- Is any task in the narrative too vague for the client to tell what was done and why?No71%
- Does the line include clerical or administrative work the client does not pay for?Yes93%
- Does the line include a meeting, call or email among the firm's own people?Yes96%
- Does the line include work the guidelines exclude other than clerical work and internal meetings?No88%
- Does the line include legal research?Yes96%
- Does the line bill work that a more junior timekeeper than the one named would normally do?Yes96%
- Which UTBMS litigation task code fits the main work in the line?L120 Analysis and strategy92%
- What should the approving lawyer do with this invoice line?Review for excluded work or staffing96%
These are real answers stored from one run on this example.
Test it on your own data
The quickest way to decide is a file run on your own records. A file run in the app answers up to 10,000 rows and gives you the file back with the answers added.
This is for the first prism, Fix time entries before the bill goes out. Each prism lists its own fields in "The prisms behind it" below.
- What to send
- A CSV or TSV file with column names in the first row, or a JSON array of objects, one item per row. You pick the column for each thing the prism reads: Time entry narrative; Matter type. A row's fields together take up to about 100,000 characters.
- What comes back
- The same rows with the prism's columns added: is_real_narrative, is_real_narrative_probability, block_billed, block_billed_probability, vague, vague_probability, clerical_task, clerical_task_probability, internal_conference, internal_conference_probability, other_excluded_work, other_excluded_work_probability, unprofessional_content, unprofessional_content_probability, task_code, task_code_probability, activity_code, activity_code_probability, suggested_step, suggested_step_probability. Each answer says how sure it is, so the unsure rows are easy to find and give to a person.
- Against your team's answers
- Add columns with the answers your team gave, and the app reports how often Prismlet agreed, question by question and at each cutoff, split by a column such as language or site, with every miss listed. Your team's answers stay in your browser.
How it reaches your team
Works today
- Call the API from your time-entry or practice management system as each entry is saved
- Run a file of up to 10,000 entries in the app, one time entry per row, up to about 100,000 characters a row
Built with you
- We work with you to send each new entry from your time-entry system, such as iTimekeep or Aderant, as it is saved
- We work with you to put each client's billing guidelines into its own prism, so each entry is read against its client's rules
- We work with you to put each flag into the pre-bill review your billing coordinators already use
The prisms behind it
Fix time entries before the bill goes out
Fields
- Time entry narrative
- Matter type
Context
Outside counsel billing guidelines of client 10442, a US manufacturing company, as they apply to time entry narratives. Codes follow the ABA Uniform Task-Based Management System (UTBMS). 1. One task per entry. The client reduces or rejects entries that group several tasks under one time charge (block billing). One task described with more than one verb, such as "draft and revise motion", is one task. 2. Specific narratives. Each narrative states what was done, on which document, issue or witness, and why. The client rejects as vague any task described only as "work on file", "attention to matter", "review documents", "research", "trial preparation" or similar, with nothing more. 3. No clerical or administrative work, at any rate: scheduling, calendaring, filing, copying, scanning, printing, Bates labelling, organising files, binders or exhibits, data entry, updating the firm's systems, and preparing, reviewing or correcting the firm's own bills. 4. No internal conferences. The client does not pay for meetings, calls or emails among the firm's own lawyers and staff unless the client asked for the meeting. Communications with the client, opposing counsel, experts, the court and other outside parties are billable. 5. Other excluded work: time for a timekeeper new to the matter to learn the file; training and continuing legal education; local travel; conflict checks and engagement letters; answering the client's audit of the firm's bills; overtime meals and other overhead. 6. Narratives are read by the client's in-house lawyers. They must not contain remarks about the client or its staff, jokes, complaints about workload, or statements that work was redone because of the firm's own mistake. 7. Each entry carries a UTBMS task code and activity code. Hours, rates, time increments, daily limits and research approvals are checked by the firm's billing system and are not part of this review.
Questions
Is the narrative a description of work actually done? Yes / No
Read the time entry narrative. Does it describe work done on the matter, in words written for this entry? Yes: The narrative describes work, however briefly or badly. No: The narrative is blank, a placeholder such as "TBD", "see above" or "time", or template text not written for this entry.
Does the entry group two or more distinct tasks under one time charge? Yes / No
Rule 1 of the billing guidelines forbids block billing. Read the time entry narrative. Does it describe two or more distinct tasks in one entry without saying how the time splits between them? One task described with several verbs, such as "draft and revise motion", is one task. Yes: Two or more distinct tasks appear and the time is not split between them. No: The narrative describes one task, or gives the time for each task separately.
Is any task in the narrative too vague for the client to tell what was done and why? Yes / No
Rule 2 of the billing guidelines asks every narrative to state what was done, on which document, issue or witness, and why. Read the time entry narrative task by task. Is any task described so generally that a client reading only this narrative could not tell what was done or what it was for? Yes: At least one task is described only in generic words such as "work on file", "attention to matter", "review documents" or "research". No: Every task names what was done and the document, issue, witness or purpose it concerned. A task that points back to the one before it, such as "re same", takes that task's subject.
Does the entry include clerical or administrative work the client does not pay for? Yes / No
Rule 3 of the billing guidelines excludes clerical and administrative work at any rate. Read the time entry narrative. Does any part of it describe scheduling, calendaring, filing, copying, scanning, printing, Bates labelling, organising files, binders or exhibits, data entry, updating the firm's systems, or work on the firm's own bills? Yes: At least one task in the entry is clerical or administrative work of that kind. No: Every task in the entry is legal or substantive work. Reviewing or analysing documents for their content is not clerical.
Does the entry include a meeting, call or email among the firm's own people? Yes / No
Rule 4 of the billing guidelines excludes meetings, calls and emails among the firm's own lawyers and staff. Read the time entry narrative. Does any part of it describe communication only among people at the firm? Treat a person as firm staff when the narrative calls them an associate, partner, paralegal, colleague or team member, or says "internal" or "office conference". Yes: At least one task is a meeting, call or email among firm people, and the narrative does not say the client asked for it. No: No such task appears, or every communication in the entry is with the client, opposing counsel, an expert, the court or another outside party.
Does the entry include work the guidelines exclude other than clerical work and internal meetings? Yes / No
Rule 5 of the billing guidelines lists further work the client does not pay for: time for a timekeeper new to the matter to learn the file, training and continuing legal education, local travel, conflict checks and engagement letters, answering the client's audit of the bills, overtime meals and other overhead. Read the time entry narrative. Does any part of it describe work on that list? Clerical work and internal meetings are asked about separately and do not count here. Yes: At least one task in the entry is work on the rule 5 list. No: No task in the entry is on the rule 5 list.
Does the narrative contain anything unfit for the client's lawyers to read? Yes / No
Rule 6 of the billing guidelines: the client's in-house lawyers read every narrative. Read the time entry narrative. Does it contain a remark about the client or its staff, a joke, a complaint about workload, or a statement that work was redone because of the firm's own mistake? Yes: The narrative contains at least one such remark or admission. No: The narrative is neutral and factual throughout.
Which UTBMS litigation task code fits the main work in the entry? Choice
Read the matter type and the time entry narrative. Choose the UTBMS litigation task code for the main work in the entry: the task that most of the narrative is about. If the entry is block billed, code the task described in most detail. Choose "Not litigation work" when the matter or the work is transactional, advisory or otherwise outside litigation.
Which UTBMS activity code fits the main work in the entry? Choice
Read the time entry narrative. Choose the UTBMS activity code for the main work in the entry: the task that most of the narrative is about. If the entry is block billed, code the task described in most detail.
What should billing ask for before this entry goes on the bill? Choice
Read the time entry narrative against the billing guidelines in the context. Suggest the step a billing coordinator should take before the entry reaches the client. A person makes every change; this only suggests where to start. When more than one step fits, choose the one lowest in the list.
Lens columns
is_real_narrative, is_real_narrative_probability, block_billed, block_billed_probability, vague, vague_probability, clerical_task, clerical_task_probability, internal_conference, internal_conference_probability, other_excluded_work, other_excluded_work_probability, unprofessional_content, unprofessional_content_probability, task_code, task_code_probability, activity_code, activity_code_probability, suggested_step, suggested_step_probability
This prism on its own pageCheck outside counsel invoice lines against your guidelines
Fields
- Invoice line narrative
- Timekeeper role, as billed
- Matter type
Context
Outside counsel guidelines of Norrfield Software, a business software company, as they apply to the narratives on law firm invoices. Every firm on Norrfield's panel agreed to them when it was engaged. Invoices arrive on the e-billing platform one line per time entry, with UTBMS codes. Each line is read here before the approving lawyer in Norrfield's legal team sees the invoice. The answers point the approver at lines to look at; the approver decides every query and every reduction, and the firm can answer each one. 1. One task per entry. Norrfield queries entries that group several tasks under one time charge (block billing). One task described with more than one verb, such as "draft and revise motion", is one task. 2. Specific narratives. Each narrative states what was done, on which document, issue or witness, and why. Norrfield queries as vague any task described only as "work on file", "attention to matter", "review documents", "research", "trial preparation" or similar, with nothing more. 3. No clerical or administrative work, at any rate: scheduling, calendaring, filing, copying, scanning, printing, Bates labelling, organising files, binders or exhibits, data entry, updating the firm's systems, and preparing, reviewing or correcting the firm's own bills. 4. No internal conferences. Norrfield does not pay for meetings, calls or emails among the firm's own lawyers and staff unless Norrfield asked for the meeting. Communications with Norrfield, opposing counsel, experts, the court and other outside parties are billable. 5. Other excluded work: time for a timekeeper new to the matter to learn the file; training and continuing legal education; local travel; conflict checks and engagement letters; answering Norrfield's questions about the firm's bills; overtime meals and other overhead. 6. Staffing. Work is done by the most junior timekeeper who can do it well. Norrfield does not pay partner, counsel or associate time for work a paralegal would normally do, such as indexing or organising documents, first-level document review, cite-checking or preparing routine filings, or partner time for work a junior associate would normally do. 7. Legal research of more than three hours on one issue needs Norrfield's written approval in advance. 8. Each line carries the UTBMS task code for the work it describes. Rates, hours, time increments, budgets and research approvals are checked by the e-billing platform and by code, not here. Code also compares the task code the firm billed with the one answered here.
Questions
Is the narrative a description of work actually done? Yes / No
Read the invoice line narrative. Does it describe work done on the matter, in words written for this line? Yes: The narrative describes work, however briefly or badly. No: The narrative is blank, a placeholder such as "TBD", "see above" or "time", or template text not written for this line.
Does the line group two or more distinct tasks under one time charge? Yes / No
Rule 1 of the guidelines forbids block billing. Read the invoice line narrative. Does it describe two or more distinct tasks in one line without saying how the time splits between them? One task described with several verbs, such as "draft and revise motion", is one task. Yes: Two or more distinct tasks appear and the time is not split between them. No: The narrative describes one task, or gives the time for each task separately.
Is any task in the narrative too vague for the client to tell what was done and why? Yes / No
Rule 2 of the guidelines asks every narrative to state what was done, on which document, issue or witness, and why. Read the invoice line narrative task by task. Is any task described so generally that a reader of this line alone could not tell what was done or what it was for? Yes: At least one task is described only in generic words such as "work on file", "attention to matter", "review documents" or "research". No: Every task names what was done and the document, issue, witness or purpose it concerned. A task that points to another task on the line, such as "re research plan", takes that task's subject.
Does the line include clerical or administrative work the client does not pay for? Yes / No
Rule 3 of the guidelines excludes clerical and administrative work at any rate. Read the invoice line narrative. Does any part of it describe scheduling, calendaring, filing, copying, scanning, printing, Bates labelling, organising files, binders or exhibits, data entry, updating the firm's systems, or work on the firm's own bills? Yes: At least one task in the line is clerical or administrative work of that kind. No: Every task in the line is legal or substantive work. Reviewing or analysing documents for their content is not clerical.
Does the line include a meeting, call or email among the firm's own people? Yes / No
Rule 4 of the guidelines excludes meetings, calls and emails among the firm's own lawyers and staff. Read the invoice line narrative. Does any part of it describe communication only among people at the firm? Treat a person as firm staff when the narrative calls them an associate, partner, paralegal, colleague or team member, or says "internal" or "office conference". Yes: At least one task is a meeting, call or email among firm people, and the narrative does not say Norrfield asked for it. No: No such task appears, or every communication in the line is with Norrfield, opposing counsel, an expert, the court or another outside party.
Does the line include work the guidelines exclude other than clerical work and internal meetings? Yes / No
Rule 5 of the guidelines lists further work Norrfield does not pay for: time for a timekeeper new to the matter to learn the file, training and continuing legal education, local travel, conflict checks and engagement letters, answering Norrfield's questions about the bills, overtime meals and other overhead. Read the invoice line narrative. Does any part of it describe work on that list? Clerical work and internal meetings are asked about separately and do not count here. Yes: At least one task in the line is work on the rule 5 list. No: No task in the line is on the rule 5 list.
Does the line include legal research? Yes / No
Rule 7 of the guidelines needs advance approval for more than three hours of research on one issue. Code checks the hours and the approvals; this question only says whether research is billed. Read the invoice line narrative. Yes: At least one task is legal research: finding and reading cases, statutes, regulations or commentary on a point of law. No: No task is legal research. Reading the documents in the matter, or finding out the facts, is not legal research.
Does the line bill work that a more junior timekeeper than the one named would normally do? Yes / No
Rule 6 of the guidelines asks for work to be done by the most junior timekeeper who can do it well. Read the timekeeper role and the invoice line narrative. Judge each task by the kind of work it is, not by how well it was done. Yes: At least one task is work a paralegal would normally do, such as indexing or organising documents, first-level review, cite-checking or preparing a routine filing, billed by a lawyer; or work a junior associate would normally do billed by a partner. No: Every task suits the timekeeper's role, or the timekeeper is a paralegal.
Which UTBMS litigation task code fits the main work in the line? Choice
Read the matter type and the invoice line narrative. Choose the UTBMS litigation task code for the main work in the line: the task that most of the narrative is about. If the line is block billed, code the task described in most detail. Choose "Not litigation work" when the matter or the work is transactional, advisory or otherwise outside litigation. Code compares this answer with the code the firm billed.
What should the approving lawyer do with this invoice line? Choice
Read the invoice line narrative and the timekeeper role against the guidelines in the context. Suggest where the approving lawyer should start with this line. The approver makes every decision and the firm can answer every query; this only suggests a starting point. When more than one step fits, choose the one lowest in the list.
Lens columns
is_real_narrative, is_real_narrative_probability, block_billed, block_billed_probability, vague, vague_probability, clerical_task, clerical_task_probability, internal_conference, internal_conference_probability, other_excluded_work, other_excluded_work_probability, legal_research, legal_research_probability, role_too_senior, role_too_senior_probability, task_code, task_code_probability, suggested_step, suggested_step_probability
This prism on its own pageSee it on your own records
Prismlet is invite only for now. Tell us what you would send it and we will set you up.